Six specialist remits, a director, and a coordinator define the research desk. The Head of Trading adds supervisory review. Qualified inputs support a proposal; missing evidence produces an abstention. Independent risk controls decide what is allowed.
Role directory · Evidence availability varies · No live trading authority.
Each role contributes a different view. Open a remit to see its domain, output, and boundaries.
Weighs six specialist views and decides whether a thesis survives.
Reads trend and structure across timeframes so a 5-minute signal is never mistaken for a trend.
Examines available depth and spread evidence for thin liquidity and fill risk. Public quotes alone cannot establish trader intent.
Reads what options pricing implies about the size and direction of the next move.
Tracks coins moving on and off exchanges, where large holders often show their hand.
Measures how crowded a trade is, and where forced selling could cascade.
Flags scheduled events and session handovers that can overturn a clean setup.
Turns the director’s consensus into one formal proposal for the risk kernel.
Deterministic checks on exposure, leverage, liquidation distance, and data health. It reads the coordinator’s proposal and can refuse it, narrow it, or trigger SafeState. No agent can overrule it.
Test the risk gateEach specialist publishes observations from its own domain, with a confidence and the evidence behind it.
Peers challenge each claim. A breakout the order-flow specialist cannot confirm, or an event the calendar flags, weakens the thesis.
The director weighs what survived and either sets a direction or records a documented no-trade.
The coordinator writes one proposal with an entry, a size range, and the condition that invalidates it.
The risk kernel approves, narrows, or refuses, and the verdict is recorded with the limits that produced it.
Members can inspect available research messages and review decisions in the paper workspace. Missing inputs remain visible as abstentions.
